I never understood how they could say ‘safe and effective’ for a novel therapy without long-term safety data.
On top of that a large cohort of the population was never in danger of severe disease or death from this virus.
Geert Vandenbossche warned that vaccinating the population out of a pandemic was never a good idea and would not achieve herd immunity.
In previous lives these products would have been taken off the market long ago.
The chikungunya vaccine was pulled when 3 people developed signs of arthritis in the trial.
So now we have a PM who today in Parliament says that ‘Covid vaccines are safe’, whilst we now know there are known issues, such as the potential for cardiac problems, DNA contamination, frame shifting and the question of all the potential causes of the excess deaths in multiple countries.
I have just ordered Julie Ponesse’s book ‘My choice’, a Canadian ethics professor who resigned in tears when she could not go along with the mandates and continue to teach ethics.
It is my opinion that these mRNA products should be pulled off the market whilst further analysis of data is carried out.
Good news is that people are voting with their feet.
Thanks for the recommendation. I admired Julie Ponesse for her principled commitment to ethics. It was disturbing to read the opinions of the other ethicists who were widely platformed as THE authority in the pandemic (Daniel Sokol and the likes). I remember the BMJ were quite keen on his ideas though there were some good rapid responses (https://www.bmj.com/content/375/bmj.n2670/rr-7/).
I do have an uneasy feeling about the fall-out of all this further down the line.
A strong letter from Holly Young. Good to know some people stood up for medical ethics.
Like you I worry about the fall-out of all of this, whilst the mainstream pretends nothing is wrong.
It would be interesting to know how many people have lost trust in the politicians and public health. More people are starting to question the benefits of all sorts of vaccines.
I never understood how they could say ‘safe and effective’ for a novel therapy without long-term safety data.
On top of that a large cohort of the population was never in danger of severe disease or death from this virus.
Geert Vandenbossche warned that vaccinating the population out of a pandemic was never a good idea and would not achieve herd immunity.
In previous lives these products would have been taken off the market long ago.
The chikungunya vaccine was pulled when 3 people developed signs of arthritis in the trial.
So now we have a PM who today in Parliament says that ‘Covid vaccines are safe’, whilst we now know there are known issues, such as the potential for cardiac problems, DNA contamination, frame shifting and the question of all the potential causes of the excess deaths in multiple countries.
I have just ordered Julie Ponesse’s book ‘My choice’, a Canadian ethics professor who resigned in tears when she could not go along with the mandates and continue to teach ethics.
It is my opinion that these mRNA products should be pulled off the market whilst further analysis of data is carried out.
Good news is that people are voting with their feet.
Thanks for the recommendation. I admired Julie Ponesse for her principled commitment to ethics. It was disturbing to read the opinions of the other ethicists who were widely platformed as THE authority in the pandemic (Daniel Sokol and the likes). I remember the BMJ were quite keen on his ideas though there were some good rapid responses (https://www.bmj.com/content/375/bmj.n2670/rr-7/).
I do have an uneasy feeling about the fall-out of all this further down the line.
A strong letter from Holly Young. Good to know some people stood up for medical ethics.
Like you I worry about the fall-out of all of this, whilst the mainstream pretends nothing is wrong.
It would be interesting to know how many people have lost trust in the politicians and public health. More people are starting to question the benefits of all sorts of vaccines.