Extremely informative overview. How is such egregious malpractice still largely unknown by the general public? I think we know the answer to that! MSM, Govts., Regulatory bodies and other publicly funded institutions have betrayed their core functions and by association, we, the public. I can never trust them again. Ever!
The best indicator of future behaviour is past behaviour and the Vioxx scandal provides a useful template for comparison - if you haven't read Peter Gotzches 'Deadly Medicine and Organised Crime' I recommend it if you want to read about how corrupt the system is. Until recently it was quite mainstream for medics to posture healthy scepticism, one might even say it was fashionable.
Everyone understands that trust is fundamental to acceptance of public health interventions and there is an acknowledgement that trust has been eroded or lost in the past 4 years. But rather than try to really understand the reasons for the loss of trust, it is easier to trot out the tired old antivaxxer conspiracy theory disinformation tropes, and identify this as a threat to be eliminated through censorship and punishment. As far as I can see, all that this deflection of blame does is self-soothe. In truth, people prefer not to think that ordinary people in the establishment would let them down so badly.
I agree! The tools the Establishment wish to employ to promote trust are likely only further to erode it. I hope many more are becoming aware of just what abuses were heaped upon us. If not, the cycle will repeat. Thankyou for the heads up on Peter Gotzches work - I will certainly read it.
Very nice summary and I like the embroidered picture of Clare Craig.
Maybe your whole collection could form part of an art installation!
You will find the following paper quite interesting too. It touches on the subject of the problem with the use of leaky vaccines in mass vaccination programs.
CRESSLER, C. E., McLEOD, D. V., ROZINS, C., VAN DEN HOOGEN, J., & DAY, T. (2016). The adaptive evolution of virulence: a review of theoretical predictions and empirical tests. Parasitology, 143(7), 915–930. doi:10.1017/S003118201500092X
Thanks Myra. I'll have a look at that paper, it looks interesting.
I still can't get my head around the fact that Brook Jackson spelled this all out explicitly for the medical profession in the BMJ and yet over 2 years later it remains taboo to engage in discussions about the evidence for safety. It has to be cognitive dissonance, nothing else explains what looks like wilful blindness.
I'm sewing the panels into quilt panels. It's a big job ;-)
Extremely informative overview. How is such egregious malpractice still largely unknown by the general public? I think we know the answer to that! MSM, Govts., Regulatory bodies and other publicly funded institutions have betrayed their core functions and by association, we, the public. I can never trust them again. Ever!
The best indicator of future behaviour is past behaviour and the Vioxx scandal provides a useful template for comparison - if you haven't read Peter Gotzches 'Deadly Medicine and Organised Crime' I recommend it if you want to read about how corrupt the system is. Until recently it was quite mainstream for medics to posture healthy scepticism, one might even say it was fashionable.
Everyone understands that trust is fundamental to acceptance of public health interventions and there is an acknowledgement that trust has been eroded or lost in the past 4 years. But rather than try to really understand the reasons for the loss of trust, it is easier to trot out the tired old antivaxxer conspiracy theory disinformation tropes, and identify this as a threat to be eliminated through censorship and punishment. As far as I can see, all that this deflection of blame does is self-soothe. In truth, people prefer not to think that ordinary people in the establishment would let them down so badly.
I agree! The tools the Establishment wish to employ to promote trust are likely only further to erode it. I hope many more are becoming aware of just what abuses were heaped upon us. If not, the cycle will repeat. Thankyou for the heads up on Peter Gotzches work - I will certainly read it.
Very nice summary and I like the embroidered picture of Clare Craig.
Maybe your whole collection could form part of an art installation!
You will find the following paper quite interesting too. It touches on the subject of the problem with the use of leaky vaccines in mass vaccination programs.
CRESSLER, C. E., McLEOD, D. V., ROZINS, C., VAN DEN HOOGEN, J., & DAY, T. (2016). The adaptive evolution of virulence: a review of theoretical predictions and empirical tests. Parasitology, 143(7), 915–930. doi:10.1017/S003118201500092X
Thanks Myra. I'll have a look at that paper, it looks interesting.
I still can't get my head around the fact that Brook Jackson spelled this all out explicitly for the medical profession in the BMJ and yet over 2 years later it remains taboo to engage in discussions about the evidence for safety. It has to be cognitive dissonance, nothing else explains what looks like wilful blindness.
I'm sewing the panels into quilt panels. It's a big job ;-)
In that case I would submit it to the Royal Academy’s Summer Exhibition ;)!